Showing posts with label Canadian literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canadian literature. Show all posts

September 03, 2007

Back to school

Tuesday is our first day back to school. I don't get overly agitated by use of the word "school", and I don't go out of my way to avoid it, which is why I don't bother with "back to not school" or "not back to school" or "back to homeschool" constructions. I liked school, adored it really, and so did Tom. Part of the reason we pulled Laura out partway through first grade is that we didn't want to her to start loathing the idea of school.

While I had planned on the usual sort of first-day-back activities -- admiring new school supplies and some fun new books and CDs -- the local library made other plans, inviting an Alberta author who specializes in stories about farm life in the forties and his career as a Mountie. Since these are the sort of old-fashioned true-life tales the kids very much enjoy, I decided it would be a dandy way to mark the beginning of the new year. But I'm fairly certain there won't be too many other kids, homeschooled or otherwise, in attendance, and even with me we'll probably be on the younger side of the age spectrum.

Wednesday won't find the kids gathered around the kitchen table with their math and grammar books either. We'll be back at the library, since I have a meeting to help plan its big 75th anniversary party, another nifty project for the kids to help with, considering that the library really is our home away from home. Later in the day, piano and voice lessons begin.

So we'll gather around the kitchen table with the math and spelling books on Thursday, in our one-room schoolhouse. I've always had a fondness for one-room schoolhouses, probably dating back to the Little House books. I can see one from my kitchen window -- though it's now a neighbor's grainery -- the very one after which we've named our home school.

* * *
"To fit the individual to live and to function in the institutional life of his day."

This statement on the purpose of education kept bouncing about in my head. We'd had to memorize it at Normal [teacher training] School along with the bit about all learning being specific. But how, I wondered when I faced my first class, was I to achieve this in Willowgreen School?

In the first place these children could function pretty well already. From the smallest to the largest they could milk cows, feed them, clean out the barn, harness and drive horses, burn Russian thistle, plough, plant, and harvest. From their mothers the girls learned how to sew and bake and even how to deliver babies. The one bitter lesson they had to learn and I couldn't teach them was how to exist without funds in the harshest climate in the world.

But I realized that even in that small group there would be some who didn't want to be farmers. Who had a compulsion to get out of this mess into an environment where people lived like human beings. How about them?

For many years the old cry "Go West, young man" had been completely reversed so that New York, Toronto, Boston, and other eastern cities were filled with young people from the West seeking careers in journalism, advertising, drama, broadcasting, and business. How could I help prepare them to fit in to this world of culture, competition, and status seeking?

To complicate my problem the "modern trend" in education had finally seeped up to Saskatchewan so that the Department of Education had made extensive changes in its curriculum. The history courses, for instance, had been completely transformed to put more emphasis on living than on dying. Instead of nice, clean-cut facts about wars and generals and kings, such as I'd learned in public school, I was supposed to teach about such vague things as the development of towns, fairs, and guilds. And it wasn't to be called by the opprobrious name of History any more. Combined with Geography it had become Social Studies.

Similarly other subjects had been mutilated. Instead of notes to be dictated, copied, and memorized there was all this nonsense about projects and research. To further compound my confusion, no textbooks had yet been produced to cover the new approach. I had to get by with a tattered set of readers, some spellers, and the good old Elementary Arithmetic, parts I and II.

The library consisted of a book by James Oliver Currwood, a big tome called "Beautiful Joe's Paradise" and, of all things, a green-covered volume entitled "White Slavery -- The Horrible Traffic in Young Women". I removed it from the collection.

I solved the problem in the only practical way possible. After a couple of hours of futile fussing over a time-table that would include all the subjects for all the grades, I chucked the whole business and decided to teach reading, writing, and arithmetic. Naturally, the four beginners who couldn't read or write a word were my first, biggest, and most challenging task. What I did with them in Grade One would affect their whole school career. So I gave them about one-third of my teaching time. ...

All things considered, teaching those beginners to read gave me more downright satisfaction than anything else I've ever done. They couldn't read a word when I began with them, and when I finished each could stand up beside his seat and read words and sentences and stories. That's the kind of progress you can see.

But finding something for them to do while I was busy with the other grades presented a real problem. Thank Heaven for plasticine! Each child had a tattered match box full of it and a piece of oilcloth to roll it on. After each lesson out came the sticky green stuff and they proceeded to model the animals featured in the lesson ["The Little Red Hen"]. The first time this happened, I found little Sarah Friesen with a perfectly proportioned pig. So amazed was I that I almost asked her the silly question "Did you make this yourself?", until I realized that it would be equally amazing if her neighbour had done it for her. Her skill at drawing turned out to be equally startling. From what far-off ancestor had such a talent come?

And at the conclusion of each number-word lesson they took our their little post-shaped pegs, coloured green and red, and practised counting or whatever else took their fancy. Sometimes I'd glance over and see a tired head resting on a skinny arm and the weary, undernourished owner fast asleep. This was the best seat work of all.

Just moving across the room from grade to grade, reader to reader, took up the full morning. Most of the afternoon went in the same way with arithmetic. For reading and arithmetic are the two subjects on which you can't skimp without bad trouble later.

What about the other subjects? Well, my stolen encyclopaedia took care of them. I'm not fool enough to divulge the name of this set of books (I don't want to get a bill at this late date) but I will say that they are the finest every printed.

And right here I'd like to say a word for encyclopaedias in general and for the men who reap calumny for their efforts to sell them from door to door. The value of a good encyclopaedia to a family is second only to that of good parents. "Look it up," is the best counsel an inquisitive youngster can get from an oldster. Which is larger, New York or Tokyo? Look it up. What is a crustacean? Find out for yourself. Who was president following McKinley? It's in the book.

It's also a fact that few people go out and buy this handy home pedagogue of their own volition. Like insurance, books aren't bought; they are sold. And of all the hard things to sell in this world an encyclopaedia set is the hardest. A man who buys a new are every year, whose liquor bill runs into three figures, and who wouldn't be caught dead in last year's suit, will kick a book salesman into the snow and be horribly indignant, because he may have been "taken" for a couple of hundred. . . .

But to get back to my pilfered volumes. I still have them, and besides saving my life at Willowgreen School, they've been manhandled to tatters by my own five children. In the front fly-leaf is a statement to the effect that the purpose of the work is to inspire ambition, provide the inquiring mind with accurate information told in an interesting style, stimulate the imagination, and thus lead to broader fields of knowledge. Amen!

Besides all this, they are easy for any child of Grade Five or better to read or understand.

So, to fill the spaces between arithmetic, reading, spelling and grammar lessons, I assigned research from the encyclopaedia. The pupils looked up a subject, read what there was to read about it, and wrote a report. At first their efforts were pretty bad, but gradually they became surprisingly adept. Actually, each child spent about 80 per cent of his time working on his own. There's just a chance they gained in self-reliance more than they lost in lack of attention from me.
from Why Shoot the Teacher, 1965, by Max Braithwaite (1911-1995), an account of his first teaching assignment in a rural Saskatchewan one-room schoolhouse in 1933 and the first volume in his autobiographical trilogy; next came Never Sleep Three in a Bed (1969), followed by The Night We Stole the Mountie's Car (1971), which won the Stephen Leacock Medal for Humour. Braithwaite was a Saskatchewan boy himself, born and raised in Nokomis.

Braithwaite sold his first article, a collaboration with a friend, to Maclean's magazine in 1937; it was a critique of the Saskatchewan education system entitled "School Drought". With his half of the check, he bought a secondhand typewriter and never looked back. After a stint in the Canadian Navy during World War II, he earned his living thereafter as a freelance writer.

For more on the life and works of the very funny, very moving Max Braithwaite, click here and here.

October 30, 2006

Home Schooling

Carol Windley on deciding to become a writer: "I love the way language can be used to create a faithful facsimile of real people living real lives, although changed, of course, by fiction's magical prism. As a child I fell into the world of books with great relief and joy -- in a book's pages, life made sense. Perhaps it's a natural process to go from reading to writing, to want to join in that wonderful community of writers and words. Besides, it happens to be the only thing I can do reasonably well."
I've been a fan of Carol Windley's writing since discovering her first book shortly after moving to Canada 12 years ago. So I was thrilled to hear this summer that her newest book, Home Schooling, a collection of short stories, had just been published.

No, not about home education the way you might expect. And not nonfiction. Ms. Windley's latest is about looking "at how family is the place where we first learn about relationships and community," she said in a recent interview. She continued, "Parents hope to give their children a sense of family history as well as certain attitudes and values and while children are very receptive, very willing to learn, they're also very critical and sceptical. In a child's imagination, received wisdom can undergo startling changes. And in a family, everything is fluid and mutable, anyway, as a result of personality and temperament and circumstance, so trying to give of a sense of this in the fictional families in Home Schooling became my main concern."

Impatient for my interlibrary loan copy to arrive, I've been happy to discover two recent interviews, the one mentioned above and this one with the CBC; happier still to learn that she's working on another novel. Even in Canada Carol Windley has been rather overlooked, maybe because of the spans between books. It's been eight years since her last book, the novel Breathing Underwater, and that came out five years after her debut work, the short story collection Visible Light. But now Home Schooling is one of the five shortlisted titles for this year's Giller Prize, the winner of which will be announced on November 7th (on live television no less), and I'm hoping that Ms. Windley will get more of the attention she deserves.

Carol Windley on what she would do with the Giller prize money ($40,000 CAN) if she wins: "If I were lucky enough to win, the first thing I'd do would be to go to a bookstore and buy a completely scandalous quantity of books. I'd also do what I think would be at the top of any writer's wishlist: buy the necessary time in which to write."